Kike, wop, chink, slope, spic, nigger, raghead, redneck, faggot, honkey,
asshole. Do these words create hate and anger as one reads them?
Will people believe that I am a racist because I choose to start my article
with these words?
What about an article with the following headlines: "How the Elite Exploit Orlando","Hillary's State Dept. Blocked Investigation into Orlando's Killer's Mosque","Obama: Powerful Firearms too Easy to Get in America". Would I create hate by sharing, posting or replying on these articles?
http://www.infowars.com/hillarys-state-dept-blocked-investigation-into-orlando-killers-mosque/
http://www.nbcnews.com/video/obama-powerful-firearms-too-easy-to-get-in-america-704549443961
http://www.infowars.com/how-the-elite-exploit-orlando/
In today's society these words do not even have to be said anymore to create hatred or for people to become more divided. In fact, people do not even have to face each other anymore in order to communicate their anger and hatred. We have now the greatest hatred creating tool of all time: social media.
Alot of criticism has come about the mass television media being biased and not reporting objectively when it comes to people and situations. I have rarely heard anyone say that social media has caused biased and no objectivity. In today's world, social media is a greater source of communication than television media. Where television may only reach 22 million local viewers, social media can reach hundreds of million global viewers.
The best things about social media are also the worst things about social media. Everyone has a voice and that voice can be shared not only instantly but around the world. If people are seeking attention by doing some outrageous act, it can be shared around the world and that person can become famous. If terrorists want their actions to be public, which is their goal because it spreads fear, then social media was the best thing invented in their world.
Just look at the current issue with the Orlando shootings. An unknown person of Afghan heritage who was a US citizen and obtained guns legally. He pledges loyalty to ISIS walks into a nightclub and kills 50 Americans. Immediately the social media went crazy from the moment the news broke into the next day. Within an hour, his name was known and his father was already talking to the world.
In searching social media, the hatred had already been spread. There were at least 10 different variations of hate that was being communicated. Hatred against gays. Hatred against guns. Hatred against the President. Hatred against Hillary Clinton. Hatred against Donald Trump. Hatred against Isis. Hatred against Muslims. Hatred against the government. Hatred against Bernie Sanders. Hatred against the FBI. This hatred came from people, pages, blogs and the national media. In the end, 50 people are dead, another 53 are injured and we have a divided country.
This is how things work in the Social Media world of the 21st century. It is no longer just an incident, it is now a religion issue, it is an immigration issue and it might have well just elected a president. We start blaming guns for the crime, we start blaming the President for not saying the right words, we start blaming religions because they belonged to them and we even blamed political parties because he belonged to it. You have the hatred coming from comments and shares of ordinary people.
People actually went on social media sites and congratulated Trump for being right about ISIS, so in reality they congratulated him for people dying. No longer do we have to justify to ourselves whether the actions we do are ok as human beings. There were people that made comments that this is okay killing homosexuals because they deserve to die for being gay, maybe this will have them stop killing Christians. No longer are we thinking of the victims as human beings who lost their life but now they are just part of a group that we hate.
The media starts with the first communication, most notably the heading. Many people will not look past the heading so it has become important for the heading to grab people. Some people will look further into the media, some will just look at the heading or a picture and move forward from there with their response. If this is all we have to go forward, is it really that important to us to know the truth?
If an article is posted that says "Hillary Clinton Wants to Stop Americans from Dying' and it is an article saying we need to look at changing our gun laws to save people, it may not get too many people to read it. However, if the same article has the title "Hillary Clinton Wants to Take Your Guns”, some may not even get past the headline thus automatically starting to create the hate. Suddenly, Hillary Clinton wants to take your guns instead of trying to save people. Another result of this is that the same story may have different headers because it comes from different sources with different agendas. So it may not just create hate in one place, it may create hate in several.
Then it is onto the next part which is people commenting on the posting or sharing it with others that may believe the same thing they do, which may cause even more anger. For years, we have internalized our frustration with things, not used our voice because we were afraid of getting into some kind of trouble or simply got mad without a way to express it. Now we can say whatever is on our mind related to the posting or against the posting. We sit behind our computers, yelling, screaming and antagonizing as much as we want without repercussions. We can be as rude and nasty as we want because who is going to stop us.
In the end, the group that uses the hatred tool the most is the one that is most effected by it: We the People. Is this the most ironic tool in history?
So how does the hate progress in social media?
I think the best example of this is during our current Presidential election cycle. The candidates may each have several pages or articles out there that show both sides of their campaign. They may use this to spread the hatred faster than what would happen on television because now the supporters are involved in it.
Bernie Sanders is not attacked by Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump but is attacked by supporters of both as wanting to spend all of our money to give people ‘free’ things. Not only that but also being attacked by the DNC for not dropping out of the race. Where the campaign has not seen the bad parts of Bernie Sanders, social media has made sure that his weaknesses and any bad history has come to light to fuel the fire.
Hatred for Hillary Clinton was nothing new, it had been happening since social media had started. There has been nothing out of bounds, even calling her Killary and even going to the depths of saying she drove a friend to suicide. The truth or the issues is not important, when people have in their mind to hate someone, it allows them to justify commenting and trolling their hateful rhetoric.
The candidate that probably understands social media the most and has used it to his advantage has been Donald Trump. He knows that the minute he makes an outlandish comment, it is going viral and it will spring both support and hatred. He knows this is free advertising, where before you had to pay to show on television. The hatred caused by his social media has gone one step further to cause violence.
It doesn’t even stop at the presidential candidates, hatred has been thrown at our current president like no other. No matter what he does, good or bad, he is going to be attacked. If he says the wrong thing or nothing at all where people think he should, he will be attacked. If people do not like him because he is black, he will be attacked. No other president in history has had to endure the social media onslaught that our current president has and all future presidents will have to deal with it as well. Can you imagine if FDR in his wheelchair had to deal with social media or Washington with his wooden false teeth?
Terrorism thrives on getting attention for their cause and having their actions made public to instill fear. Have we noticed that terrorism in the new age has actually increased or is it that we just hear about it faster? Isn't social media the perfect outlet for terrorists? Think about it, they want to see that their cause all over the place and now it is instantly broadcast throughout the world. To make it worse, they can now see the fear and division of everyone on line. They can see our comments, they can see our anger and they can see when we are fighting with each other. How does this not help terrorists?
Even groups are trying to use social media to get their cause known but many times it actually turns around into hatred. For example, Black Lives Matter is something that was created because they felt there was no voice about the deaths of black people at the hands of police officers. Some people took it as offensive that only black lives should matter, some police took it as blue lives do not matter and when BLM spoke alot of people took it as blacks trying to be militant again. Instead of looking at what they were trying to do or for BLM looking at how it was going to be perceived, everyone took their own view of it and even though some things have been done, people are still dying and people are still hating.
An interesting question is if many of those using social media are using us as hate creators because we have made it so easy for them. It used to be that incidents would bring people together, now it divides us because all sides get to express their voice about the issue. Once that voice is spread people take sides and then the issue really doesn't get fixed. Take the bathroom issue in NC. First some famous athlete changes gender and makes the entire thing public. Instead of this being a good thing for others, next thing we know the government is banning people from bathrooms. Then celebrities are cancelling shows, taking money out of people's pockets. Politicians are saying these people should not be allowed in the same place as little girls, even though they have been doing it for years. On the other side, people are saying it discriminating because it has never been proven that people are molested in bathrooms. In the end, has anything really been resolved on the issue other than hatred?
I saw a comment recently where someone asked how are we suppose to fix these issues if the people are their own worst enemy? I thought about it and I could only say that the answer lies in each of us as human beings. If we think that our religion is more important than treatment of human beings nothing can be fixed. If we think our social status is more important than treatment of human beings nothing can be fixed. If we think trying to stop our fear is more important than treatment of human beings nothing can be fixed.
Social media is only going to increase over the years and with it, the hatred. I wouldn’t be surprised if this article provoked its amount of hate simply from the words in it. If that happens, there really is nothing I can do about it. That is social media in the 21st century and we may finally be at that point where everything we say will keep us so divided we cannot come together to find the real solutions of the world.
What about an article with the following headlines: "How the Elite Exploit Orlando","Hillary's State Dept. Blocked Investigation into Orlando's Killer's Mosque","Obama: Powerful Firearms too Easy to Get in America". Would I create hate by sharing, posting or replying on these articles?
http://www.infowars.com/hillarys-state-dept-blocked-investigation-into-orlando-killers-mosque/
http://www.nbcnews.com/video/obama-powerful-firearms-too-easy-to-get-in-america-704549443961
http://www.infowars.com/how-the-elite-exploit-orlando/
In today's society these words do not even have to be said anymore to create hatred or for people to become more divided. In fact, people do not even have to face each other anymore in order to communicate their anger and hatred. We have now the greatest hatred creating tool of all time: social media.
Alot of criticism has come about the mass television media being biased and not reporting objectively when it comes to people and situations. I have rarely heard anyone say that social media has caused biased and no objectivity. In today's world, social media is a greater source of communication than television media. Where television may only reach 22 million local viewers, social media can reach hundreds of million global viewers.
The best things about social media are also the worst things about social media. Everyone has a voice and that voice can be shared not only instantly but around the world. If people are seeking attention by doing some outrageous act, it can be shared around the world and that person can become famous. If terrorists want their actions to be public, which is their goal because it spreads fear, then social media was the best thing invented in their world.
Just look at the current issue with the Orlando shootings. An unknown person of Afghan heritage who was a US citizen and obtained guns legally. He pledges loyalty to ISIS walks into a nightclub and kills 50 Americans. Immediately the social media went crazy from the moment the news broke into the next day. Within an hour, his name was known and his father was already talking to the world.
In searching social media, the hatred had already been spread. There were at least 10 different variations of hate that was being communicated. Hatred against gays. Hatred against guns. Hatred against the President. Hatred against Hillary Clinton. Hatred against Donald Trump. Hatred against Isis. Hatred against Muslims. Hatred against the government. Hatred against Bernie Sanders. Hatred against the FBI. This hatred came from people, pages, blogs and the national media. In the end, 50 people are dead, another 53 are injured and we have a divided country.
This is how things work in the Social Media world of the 21st century. It is no longer just an incident, it is now a religion issue, it is an immigration issue and it might have well just elected a president. We start blaming guns for the crime, we start blaming the President for not saying the right words, we start blaming religions because they belonged to them and we even blamed political parties because he belonged to it. You have the hatred coming from comments and shares of ordinary people.
People actually went on social media sites and congratulated Trump for being right about ISIS, so in reality they congratulated him for people dying. No longer do we have to justify to ourselves whether the actions we do are ok as human beings. There were people that made comments that this is okay killing homosexuals because they deserve to die for being gay, maybe this will have them stop killing Christians. No longer are we thinking of the victims as human beings who lost their life but now they are just part of a group that we hate.
The media starts with the first communication, most notably the heading. Many people will not look past the heading so it has become important for the heading to grab people. Some people will look further into the media, some will just look at the heading or a picture and move forward from there with their response. If this is all we have to go forward, is it really that important to us to know the truth?
If an article is posted that says "Hillary Clinton Wants to Stop Americans from Dying' and it is an article saying we need to look at changing our gun laws to save people, it may not get too many people to read it. However, if the same article has the title "Hillary Clinton Wants to Take Your Guns”, some may not even get past the headline thus automatically starting to create the hate. Suddenly, Hillary Clinton wants to take your guns instead of trying to save people. Another result of this is that the same story may have different headers because it comes from different sources with different agendas. So it may not just create hate in one place, it may create hate in several.
Then it is onto the next part which is people commenting on the posting or sharing it with others that may believe the same thing they do, which may cause even more anger. For years, we have internalized our frustration with things, not used our voice because we were afraid of getting into some kind of trouble or simply got mad without a way to express it. Now we can say whatever is on our mind related to the posting or against the posting. We sit behind our computers, yelling, screaming and antagonizing as much as we want without repercussions. We can be as rude and nasty as we want because who is going to stop us.
In the end, the group that uses the hatred tool the most is the one that is most effected by it: We the People. Is this the most ironic tool in history?
So how does the hate progress in social media?
I think the best example of this is during our current Presidential election cycle. The candidates may each have several pages or articles out there that show both sides of their campaign. They may use this to spread the hatred faster than what would happen on television because now the supporters are involved in it.
Bernie Sanders is not attacked by Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump but is attacked by supporters of both as wanting to spend all of our money to give people ‘free’ things. Not only that but also being attacked by the DNC for not dropping out of the race. Where the campaign has not seen the bad parts of Bernie Sanders, social media has made sure that his weaknesses and any bad history has come to light to fuel the fire.
Hatred for Hillary Clinton was nothing new, it had been happening since social media had started. There has been nothing out of bounds, even calling her Killary and even going to the depths of saying she drove a friend to suicide. The truth or the issues is not important, when people have in their mind to hate someone, it allows them to justify commenting and trolling their hateful rhetoric.
The candidate that probably understands social media the most and has used it to his advantage has been Donald Trump. He knows that the minute he makes an outlandish comment, it is going viral and it will spring both support and hatred. He knows this is free advertising, where before you had to pay to show on television. The hatred caused by his social media has gone one step further to cause violence.
It doesn’t even stop at the presidential candidates, hatred has been thrown at our current president like no other. No matter what he does, good or bad, he is going to be attacked. If he says the wrong thing or nothing at all where people think he should, he will be attacked. If people do not like him because he is black, he will be attacked. No other president in history has had to endure the social media onslaught that our current president has and all future presidents will have to deal with it as well. Can you imagine if FDR in his wheelchair had to deal with social media or Washington with his wooden false teeth?
Terrorism thrives on getting attention for their cause and having their actions made public to instill fear. Have we noticed that terrorism in the new age has actually increased or is it that we just hear about it faster? Isn't social media the perfect outlet for terrorists? Think about it, they want to see that their cause all over the place and now it is instantly broadcast throughout the world. To make it worse, they can now see the fear and division of everyone on line. They can see our comments, they can see our anger and they can see when we are fighting with each other. How does this not help terrorists?
Even groups are trying to use social media to get their cause known but many times it actually turns around into hatred. For example, Black Lives Matter is something that was created because they felt there was no voice about the deaths of black people at the hands of police officers. Some people took it as offensive that only black lives should matter, some police took it as blue lives do not matter and when BLM spoke alot of people took it as blacks trying to be militant again. Instead of looking at what they were trying to do or for BLM looking at how it was going to be perceived, everyone took their own view of it and even though some things have been done, people are still dying and people are still hating.
An interesting question is if many of those using social media are using us as hate creators because we have made it so easy for them. It used to be that incidents would bring people together, now it divides us because all sides get to express their voice about the issue. Once that voice is spread people take sides and then the issue really doesn't get fixed. Take the bathroom issue in NC. First some famous athlete changes gender and makes the entire thing public. Instead of this being a good thing for others, next thing we know the government is banning people from bathrooms. Then celebrities are cancelling shows, taking money out of people's pockets. Politicians are saying these people should not be allowed in the same place as little girls, even though they have been doing it for years. On the other side, people are saying it discriminating because it has never been proven that people are molested in bathrooms. In the end, has anything really been resolved on the issue other than hatred?
I saw a comment recently where someone asked how are we suppose to fix these issues if the people are their own worst enemy? I thought about it and I could only say that the answer lies in each of us as human beings. If we think that our religion is more important than treatment of human beings nothing can be fixed. If we think our social status is more important than treatment of human beings nothing can be fixed. If we think trying to stop our fear is more important than treatment of human beings nothing can be fixed.
Social media is only going to increase over the years and with it, the hatred. I wouldn’t be surprised if this article provoked its amount of hate simply from the words in it. If that happens, there really is nothing I can do about it. That is social media in the 21st century and we may finally be at that point where everything we say will keep us so divided we cannot come together to find the real solutions of the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment